USPTO serial 85457942
MILLIKEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MILLIKEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles G. Zug
CHARLES G. ZUG NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH LLP100 N TRYON STCHARLOTTE, NC 28202-4000UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CHEMICAL ADDITIVES FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF A WIDE VARIETY OF GOODS; CHEMICALS FOR USE IN INDUSTRY; CHEMICALS AND CHEMICAL COMPOSITIONS, NAMELY ANTISTATIC AGENTS, EMULSIFIERS, SIZING COMPOUNDS, SOIL RELEASE AGENTS, SURFACE MODIFIERS, DYEING AUXILIARIES, WETTING AGENTS, DISPERSANTS, NUCLEATING AGENTS, REINFORCING AGENTS, CLARIFYING AGENTS, ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, GELLING AGENTS, CURING AGENTS, UV INHIBITORS, AND CORROSION INHIBITORS | ACTIVE | — |
| 002 | COLORANTS; PIGMENTS; COLORANTS IN THE NATURE OF FUGITIVE TINTS; SPRAY PATTERN INDICATORS IN THE NATURE OF COLORANTS FOR APPLICATION OF FERTILIZERS, FUNGICIDES, HERBICIDES AND INSECTICIDES; DYES FOR BODIES OF WATER FOR AESTHETIC COLORATION ONLY | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | WOVEN FABRICS, KNITTED FABRICS, NON-WOVEN TEXTILE FABRICS; TEXTILE FABRICS MADE OF NATURAL AND/OR SYNTHETIC FIBERS AND COMBINATIONS THEREOF FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF APPAREL, UPHOLSTERY, TABLE LINEN, INDUSTRIAL AND BUILDING PRODUCTS, TAPE, CURTAINS, TIRE REINFORCEMENTS, SECURITY VEILS AND SCREENS, AND FOR USE AS CAMOUFLAGE SCREENING FABRIC; TABLE LINEN; MOLDABLE NONWOVEN SUBSTRATES, NAMELY, NONWOVEN TEXTILE FABRICS AND NONWOVEN FABRICS AND FELTS; SYNTHETIC FABRIC THAT CAN BE THERMOFORMED TO CREATE MOLDED PARTS OR LAMINATED SHEETS; TEXTILE FABRICS HAVING FLAME RETARDANT PROPERTIES OR INSULATING PROPERTIES AND USED AS AN INSULATING LAYER IN THE MANUFACTURE OF MATTRESSES, BOX SPRINGS, MATTRESS TOPPERS AND PILLOWS; BALLISTIC RESISTANT FABRICS FOR USE IN THE PRODUCTION OF BULLETPROOF AND BLAST PROOF CLOTHING, SHOES, AND SHIELDS; MATTRESS PADS | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | CARPET BACKING; CARPET TILES; CARPETS AND RUGS; FLOOR COVERINGS; FLOOR MATS; HARD SURFACE COVERINGS FOR FLOORS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Milliken & Company
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Similar marks named MILLIKEN
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 8, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 10, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 10, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 19, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 18, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2012 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 24, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |