CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for LEON

USPTO serial 85459157

LEON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODSAID, IRA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LEON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew L. Reibman

ANDREW L. REIBMAN Seyfarth Shaw LLP233 South Wacker DriveSuite 8000Chicago, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising services; business management; business administration; providing office functionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 24, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 28, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 28, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 27, 2015EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 21, 2015EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 21, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 12, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 11, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 5, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 5, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 13, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 12, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 8, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 8, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 15, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 8, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 8, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 26, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 26, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 24, 2013IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Jun 24, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 18, 2013INCEITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST—
Jun 17, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 12, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 17, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 17, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 27, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 2, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 12, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 30, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 29, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 17, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 16, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 15, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 15, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 20, 2012GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 20, 2012GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 20, 2012CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 15, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 1, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance