USPTO serial 85460232
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark S. Friedlander
Mark S. Friedlander Law Office of Mark S. Friedlander15 Maiden Lane, Suite 2000New York, NY 10038UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | hummus and general foods sales and distribution services | ACTIVE | May 1, 2009 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2013 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Oct 28, 2013 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2013 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 3, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 2, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 30, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2012 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2012 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2012 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Jan 29, 2012 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |