Drawing for ORCHARD BREEZE

USPTO serial 85460708

ORCHARD BREEZE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEATING, MICHAEL P
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORCHARD BREEZE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joshua Becker

JOSHUA BECKER BECKER PETERS PLLC9375 E SHEA BLVD STE 100SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260-6986UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Concentrates, syrups or powders for making soft drinks or tea-flavored beverages; Concentrates, syrups or powders used in the preparation of soft drinks; Fruit-flavored beverages; Powders used in the preparation of fruit-based beverages; Powders used in the preparation of isotonic sports drinks and sports beverages; Syrups for making non-alcoholic beverages; Water beveragesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 15, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 15, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 21, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 11, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 11, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 12, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 17, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 28, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 8, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 21, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 16, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 4, 2011MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Nov 3, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance