Drawing for EVERY DEVICE WE COAT TOUCHES LIVES

USPTO serial 85461890

EVERY DEVICE WE COAT TOUCHES LIVES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
PEETE, KYLE C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EVERY DEVICE WE COAT TOUCHES LIVES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathryn Starshak

KATHRYN STARSHAK K&L GATES LLPPO BOX 1135CHICAGO, IL 60690-1135UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Application of coatings for others, namely, application of protective, wear resistant, and/or friction-lowering coatings to manufactured products consisting of rubber, plastic, ceramics or metal; application of protective, wear resistant, and/or friction-lowering coatings to glass; application of hydrophilic coatings to medical devices, dental devices, surgical devices, and diagnostic test devices; application of coatings to silicone products; application of echogenic coatings to medical devices, dental devices, surgical devices and diagnostic test devices; application of functional, protective, informational or decorative coatings to metal and plastic devices for the purpose of highlighting the different colors of the deviceACTIVE
040Application of coatings for others, namely, applying coatings ultrasonically to medical and industrial apparatusACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 30, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 30, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 26, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 1, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jan 1, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 12, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Nov 23, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 21, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 4, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 13, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED
Sep 13, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 13, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 13, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 13, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Sep 13, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Feb 20, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 5, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 4, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance