Drawing for SERVER ON A CHIP

USPTO serial 85462041

SERVER ON A CHIP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAPTER, ALAIN J
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SERVER ON A CHIP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Raj Jaipershad

RAJ JAIPERSHAD APPLIED MICRO CIRCUITS CORPORATION215 MOFFETT FIELD DRIVESUNNYVALE, CA 94089UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Central processing units (CPU); Computer networking hardware; Electronic integrated circuits; Micro processors; Semiconductor devices; SemiconductorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 26, 2013MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 22, 2013ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 22, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 24, 2013EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 24, 2013EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 24, 2013JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 24, 2013EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 10, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 10, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 10, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 31, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 30, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 30, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 6, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 6, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 5, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 5, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance