Drawing for THE Q CLUB

USPTO serial 85462538

THE Q CLUB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ERVIN, INGA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE Q CLUB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Keller

Michael J. Keller ROETZEL & ANDRESS222 S. Main St.Suzanne K. KetlerAkron, OH 44308

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Dance club services; Night club reservation services, namely, arranging for admission to night clubs and night club events; Arranging and conducting nightclub entertainment events; Disc jockey servicesACTIVE—
043Hotel, bar, restaurant and catering servicesACTIVE—
044Health spa services for health and wellness of the body and spirit, namely, providing massage, facial and body treatment services, cosmetic body care services, namely, manicures and pedicures, body waxing services; hair salon servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 15, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 15, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 11, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 7, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 7, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 16, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 15, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 13, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 13, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 20, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 13, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 13, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 14, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 14, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 28, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 12, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 12, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 13, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 18, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 29, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 13, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 2, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 2, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 2, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 1, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 1, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 7, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 5, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance