USPTO serial 85462775
NUVOLA TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRAZIER, TAMARA G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NUVOLA TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Troy Petit
495 GRAND BLVD STE 206MIRAMAR BEACH, FL 32550-1897UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Customer service and support in the nature of providing assistance to customers who have a business issue or concern in the field of secure cloud computing, namely, cloud hosting in the nature of scalable hosting of computer software, Internet websites, Internet web software applications, electronic databases, digital content and business computer software applications which are accessible via the Internet | ACTIVE | Jul 16, 2009 |
| 042 | Public, Private and Hybrid cloud computing and customization services for designing, developing, adapting and configuring specific and unique secure cloud computing solutions and services, namely, cloud hosting in the nature of scalable hosting of computer software, Internet websites, Internet web software applications, electronic databases, digital content and business computer software applications of others that are accessible via the Internet. Technical support services, troubleshooting of computer software and network problems and diagnosing of computer hardware/software/security problems in the field of cloud computing services, Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS). Installation, configuration and operation of computer software platforms for creating, managing and deploying secure cloud computing infrastructure services and Software as a Service (SaaS). Research, design and optimization of computer hardware and software to run computer software platforms for creating, managing and deploying secure cloud computing infrastructure services. Design, deployment, support, management and maintenance of secure cloud computing infrastructure software, Software as a Service (SaaS), including but not limited to accounting, collaboration, customer relationship management (CRM), enterprise resource planning (ERP), invoicing, human resource management (HRM), content management (CM) and service desk management. Security as a service (SaaS) featuring Managed Security Services (MSS) for cloud computing, including round-the-clock monitoring, analysis and management of intrusion detection systems and firewalls, overseeing patch management and upgrades, performing security assessments and security audits, implementing security measures and responding to emergencies | ACTIVE | Jul 16, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 26, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 28, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2012 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |