Drawing for FLAVOR MAKER

USPTO serial 85463175

FLAVOR MAKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLAVOR MAKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julie A. Greenberg

Julie A. Greenberg Reising Ethington P.C.755 W Big Beaver Rd, Suite 1850Troy, MI 48084United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Restaurant services, namely, carry-out restaurant services featuring pizza, chicken wings, subs, and breads for consumption on or off premises; restaurant featuring home delivery of food, in particular, pizza, chicken wings, subs, and breads for consumption on or off premisesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 27, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 27, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 27, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 3, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 3, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 4, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 3, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jun 26, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jun 26, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 23, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 22, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 18, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jan 2, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jan 2, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 3, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 8, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
May 8, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 18, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Mar 30, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 30, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 13, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 9, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 9, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 9, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 22, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 7, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 7, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance