Drawing for ARECHA

USPTO serial 85463520

ARECHA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEAM, ALEX S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ARECHA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Benjamin Wolkov, Esq.

BENJAMIN WOLKOV, ESQ. MONTERO WOLKOV LLP1441 BRICKELL AVE STE 15MIAMI, FL 33131-3430UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages except beers; wines; spirits products; namely, alcoholic cocktail mixes; alcoholic mixed beverages except beers; distilled spirits; distilled spirits of molasses; liquor; liquor and liqueur beverages, namely, rum; potable spirits; rum; spirits; spirits and liqueurs; sugar cane juice rumACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 1, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 1, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 27, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 27, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 27, 2012ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 24, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 23, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 22, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 7, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 7, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance