USPTO serial 85463595
I CONSTRUCT.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KELLY, JOHN M
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with I CONSTRUCT.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Western Australia, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sarah B. Kickham
SARAH B. KICKHAM DONOVAN & YEE LLP161 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS RM 1201NEW YORK, NY 10013-1284UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer and website software, including computer software for business and project management; computer hardware; computer systems; computer peripherals and accessories; computer software for industrial design; computer software for computer aided design; computer software for computer aided manufacture; computer software for drafting; computer software for data storage and analysis; computer hardware and peripherals relating to computer aided design or manufacture; network installations and apparatus, including cable installations and networking for the transmission of voice and data | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Engineering services, including consulting engineering and construction engineering; architectural services; architectural consulting services; design services; drafting services, including construction drafting services; land surveying services; engineering drawing services; computer programming; computer programming related to a software product mechanical research; computer software design; maintenance, updating and rental of computer software; computer and computer software related consultancy, design and development of computer hardware and software; development (design) of measuring instruments and software; installation of software; software consultancy; conversion of computer data and programs (non-physical conversion); recovery of computer data; engineering; technical project studies; research and development of new products (for third parties) | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Licensing of computer software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 22, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 1, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |