Drawing for A LA ZING

USPTO serial 85464096

A LA ZING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with A LA ZING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Denise C. Mazour

DENISE C MAZOUR MCGRATH NORTH MULLIN KRATZ PC LLO1601 DODGE ST STE 3700FIRST NATIONAL TOWEROMAHA, NE 68102 1650

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Cookware, namely, pots and pans; Kitchen utensils, namely, kitchen tongs; Beverage glassware; Dinnerware; Barware, namely, seltzer bottlesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 3, 2013MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 3, 2013ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 3, 2013OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 3, 2013OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Mar 29, 2013OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 31, 2012ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 12, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 28, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 23, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 20, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 15, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 15, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 15, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 22, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 21, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 21, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 8, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 7, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance