USPTO serial 85465618
FIESTA SEAFOOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FIESTA SEAFOOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Britt L. Anderson
BRITT L ANDERSON K&L GATES LLP630 HANSEN WAYPALO ALTO, CA 94304UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Pre-packaged dinners consisting of shrimp cutlet, shrimp nugget or seafood stock, ebi fry; Seafood, namely, frozen, farm raised, raw head on shell on, raw headless shell-on, peeled and deveined tail-on, peeled and deveined tail-off, peeled undeveined tail-off, easy peeled, cooked tail-on, cooked tail-off, cooked headless shell-on, cooked easy peeled shrimp; Shrimps, not live | ACTIVE | Jan 24, 2011 |
| 030 | Rolls; Shrimp dumplings, shrimp roll | ACTIVE | Jan 24, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2014 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 10, 2014 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 24, 2013 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2013 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 3, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 1, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 27, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 11, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |