Drawing for VIDEO+

USPTO serial 85466148

VIDEO+

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRYE, KIMBERLY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIDEO+?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lynn S. Fruchter

LYNN S. FRUCHTER COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, P.C.1133 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6710UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING A WEBSITE FEATURING NON-DOWNLOADABLE VIDEOS IN THE NATURE OF PREVIEWS OF ENTERTAINMENT CONTENT, NAMELY MOTION PICTURES AND TELEVISIONACTIVESep 23, 2011

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 10, 2012MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Oct 10, 2012ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 4, 2012ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 2, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 1, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 21, 2012MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 21, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 21, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 21, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 30, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 30, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 29, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 29, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 29, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 10, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance