USPTO serial 85466644
POMODORI DAL SOLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 4, 2017
- Examiner
- MALASHEVICH, JASON
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with POMODORI DAL SOLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Mediterranean Gourmet Foods Ltd.
Vancouver, BC, CA
Mediterranean Gourmet Foods Ltd.
Vancouver, BC, CA
Mediterranean Gourmet Foods Ltd.
Vancouver, BC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carl E. Jennison
Carl E. Jennison Jennison & Shultz, P.C.3918 Prosperity Avenue Suite 215Fairfax, 22031-3330CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | cooking oil; edible oil; salad oil; vegetable oil; potato-based gnocchi; processed pimentos; processed olives; dried figs; processed artichokes; processed peppers; processed mushrooms; processed beans; soups; cheeses; fish, not live, for food purposes; processed anchovies; packaged deli meats; antipasto comprised of processed olives; processed pickles; processed artichoke hearts; condiments, namely, pickles; canned, fresh, deli, or preserved meat, fish, and poultry; canned and dried fruit and nuts, jam and fruit spreads | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | vinegar; egg noodles; pasta; lasagna; flour- based gnocchi; spices; pimentos used as a condiment; capers; rice; cornmeal; biscuits; bread sticks; coffee; baking products, namely, Italian specialty yeasts; oil-based food flavorings being non-essential oils; confectioneries, namely, candies and chocolates; vanilla beans; coffee beans; condiments, namely, mustard; rice mixtures, namely, rice and seasoning mix combined in unitary packages; pesto; salt | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mediterranean Gourmet Foods Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Mediterranean Gourmet Foods Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Mediterranean Gourmet Foods Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named POMODORI DAL SOLE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2025 | NCS8 | NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SEC. 8 EMAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2025 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 16, 2025 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jan 10, 2025 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2024 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jul 4, 2024 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2024 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Dec 23, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 12, 2023 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Oct 12, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 12, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2023 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 17, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 28, 2016 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 5, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 14, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 15, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 10, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 10, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 20, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 25, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 21, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 2, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |