USPTO serial 85466653
ANNA'S COUNTRY KITCHEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ANNA'S COUNTRY KITCHEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kirsten Severson
Kirsten Severson KLS TRADEMARK SERVICESPO BOX 19126 4TH AVENUE POSTVANCOUVER, BC, V6K4R8CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Food products, namely, cooking oil, edible oil, salad oil, vegetable oil, potato-based gnocchi, tomato paste, processed pimentos, processed olives, dried figs, canned, cooked or otherwise processed tomatoes, sun dried tomatoes, pickled vegetables, processed vegetables, processed artichokes, processed peppers, processed mushrooms, processed beans, soups, cheeses, fish for food purposes, processed anchovies, packaged deli meats; antipasto comprised of processed olives, processed peppers, processed tomatoes, processed pickles, processed artichoke hearts, condiments, namely, pickles, canned, fresh, deli or preserved meat, fish and poultry; canned and dried fruit and nuts, jam and fruit spreads; canned vegetables, vegetable-based spreads; Food products, namely, vinegar, egg noodles, pasta, lasagna, flour- based gnocchi, pasta sauces, tomato sauces, spices, pimentos used as a condiment, capers, rice, cornmeal, biscuits, bread sticks, non-alcoholic beverages, namely, coffee; baking products, namely, Italian specialty yeasts; food flavourings being non-essential oils; confectioneries, namely, candies and chocolates, biscuits, vanilla beans, coffee beans; condiments, namely, mustard; vegetable sauces; rice mixtures, namely, rice and seasoning mix combined in unitary packages; pesto; salt; Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, fruit nectars, fruit juices and mineral water Food products | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Food products, namely, vinegar, egg noodles, pasta, lasagna, flour-based gnocchi, pasta sauces, tomato sauces, spices, pimentos used as a condiment, capers, rice, cornmeal, biscuits, bread sticks, non-alcoholic beverages, namely, coffee; baking products, namely, Italian specialty yeasts; food flavorings being non-essential oils; confectioneries, namely, candies and chocolates, biscuits, vanilla beans, coffee beans; condiments, namely, mustard; vegetable sauces; rice mixtures, namely, rice and seasoning mix combined in unitary packages; pesto; salt | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, fruit nectars, fruit juices and mineral water | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 19, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 16, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 25, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 16, 2014 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 22, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 28, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 11, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |