Drawing for TOIGO INSTITUTE LEADERSHIP EXCELLENCE ADVANCEMENT & DIVERSITY

USPTO serial 85468320

TOIGO INSTITUTE LEADERSHIP EXCELLENCE ADVANCEMENT & DIVERSITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRENCH, CURTIS W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TOIGO INSTITUTE LEADERSHIP EXCELLENCE ADVANCEMENT & DIVERSITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard A. Lyons

RICHARD A. LYONS WENDEL, ROSEN, BLACK & DEAN LLP1111 BROADWAY FL 24OAKLAND, CA 94607-4139UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Promoting careers within the field of finance for women and minorities, namely, employment, hiring, recruiting, placement, staffing and career networking services; Developing and distributing marketing materials, flyers, brochures and other forms of advertising and media promoting the services of women and minorities in finance to the public and private sectorsACTIVEOct 21, 2010
041Educational services for women and minority finance professionals, namely, arranging and conducting educational seminars, lectures, workshops, presentations, retreats and tutorial sessions in the field of finance and promoting careers within the field of finance for such professionals and developing and distributing course materials in connection therewithACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 9, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 9, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 5, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 15, 2013CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jan 7, 2013APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Dec 14, 2012EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 21, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 5, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 22, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 22, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 22, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 4, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 3, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 3, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 15, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 15, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 28, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 27, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 27, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 28, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 16, 2011MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Nov 15, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 12, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance