USPTO serial 85468473
MATRIXIT MEDICAL TRACKING SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 24, 2016
- Examiner
- LAW, CHRISTOPHER M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with MATRIXIT MEDICAL TRACKING SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MOUNT PLEASANT, WI, US
MATRIX IT MEDICAL TRACKING SYSTEMS, INC.
Brookfield, WI, US
Other trademarks owned by MATRIX IT MEDICAL TRACKING SYSTEMS, INC.
MATRIX IT MEDICAL TRACKING SYSTEMS, INC.
Mount Pleasant, WI, US
Other trademarks owned by MATRIX IT MEDICAL TRACKING SYSTEMS, INC.
MATRIX IT MEDICAL TRACKING SYSTEMS, INC.
Racine, WI, US
Other trademarks owned by MATRIX IT MEDICAL TRACKING SYSTEMS, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brianna M. Schonenberg
Brianna M. Schonenberg HUSCH BLACKWELL LLP511 North Broadway, Suite 1100Milwaukee, WI 53202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Optical scanning device for scanning and identifying surgical implants and parts thereof prior to and after implantation; said device not for providing operational efficiencies for the monitoring within hospitals of patient placement, patient transport, procedure status, and management of hospital professionals and staff | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SCANLOGIX LLC
- Other trademarks owned by MATRIX IT MEDICAL TRACKING SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MATRIX IT MEDICAL TRACKING SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MATRIX IT MEDICAL TRACKING SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named MATRIXIT MEDICAL TRACKING SYSTEMS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2026 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 24, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2021 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2021 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 9, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 25, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2021 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| May 25, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 25, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2021 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 21, 2016 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2016 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 9, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 25, 2016 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 24, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 21, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 11, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 30, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 7, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2014 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 29, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 31, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 11, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 25, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 1, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |