Drawing for FLAVORS IN LOVE

USPTO serial 85468525

FLAVORS IN LOVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with FLAVORS IN LOVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stan Cohen

STAN COHEN STANLEY DALE COHEN, ATTORNEY AT LAW104 SAMANTHA CIRWESTHAMPTON, NY 11977-1022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Arranging and conducting special events for social entertainment purposes; Arranging professional workshop and training courses; Arranging, organizing, conducting and hosting birthday parties; Arranging, organizing, conducting, and hosting social entertainment events; Conducting workshops and seminars in culinary arts, entertaining and etiquette; Consulting services in the field of culinary competitions; Educational and entertainment services, namely, providing motivational speaking services in the field of culinary arts, entertaining and etiquette; Educational services, namely, conducting informal on-line programs in the fields of culinary arts, entertaining and etiquette, and printable materials distributed therewith; Educational services, namely, conducting classes, lessons, webinars, seminars, presentations, and tv and radio shows in the field of culinary arts, entertaining and etiquette and distribution of training material in connection therewith; Educational services, namely, providing internships and apprenticeships in the field of culinary arts, entertaining and etiquette; Educational services, namely, providing online instruction in the field of culinary arts, entertaining and etiquette; Educational services, namely, providing online instruction in the field of culinary arts, entertaining, etiquette, healthy eating, new recipes, gastronomical tours, and shopping bargains via an online website; Entertainment in the nature of visual and audio performances by chefs, celebrities, and participants; Entertainment services, namely, providing a web site featuring photographic, audio, video and prose presentations featuring culinary arts, entertaining, gastronomical tours, and etiquette; Entertainment services, namely, providing an on-going radio program in the field of food; Providing a website featuring blogs and non-downloadable publications in the nature of prose, video, audio in the field(s) of culinary arts, entertaining, and etiquette; Providing a website for entertainment purposes where users can view and post comments, presentations, questions, short messages, videos, and discussions featuring chef's, culinary arts, entertaining and etiquetteACTIVEMar 23, 2011
043Consulting in the field of restaurant menu development; Providing progressive dinner events where participants sample meals and drinks at a series of restaurants; Restaurant services featuring consultation, advice, menu assistance, restaurant tours, chef interviews, reviews, and assistance with culinary arts and prep; Restaurant services, namely, providing of food and beverages for consumption on and off the premisesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 27, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 1, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 15, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 12, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance