USPTO serial 85468525
FLAVORS IN LOVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FLAVORS IN LOVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stan Cohen
STAN COHEN STANLEY DALE COHEN, ATTORNEY AT LAW104 SAMANTHA CIRWESTHAMPTON, NY 11977-1022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Arranging and conducting special events for social entertainment purposes; Arranging professional workshop and training courses; Arranging, organizing, conducting and hosting birthday parties; Arranging, organizing, conducting, and hosting social entertainment events; Conducting workshops and seminars in culinary arts, entertaining and etiquette; Consulting services in the field of culinary competitions; Educational and entertainment services, namely, providing motivational speaking services in the field of culinary arts, entertaining and etiquette; Educational services, namely, conducting informal on-line programs in the fields of culinary arts, entertaining and etiquette, and printable materials distributed therewith; Educational services, namely, conducting classes, lessons, webinars, seminars, presentations, and tv and radio shows in the field of culinary arts, entertaining and etiquette and distribution of training material in connection therewith; Educational services, namely, providing internships and apprenticeships in the field of culinary arts, entertaining and etiquette; Educational services, namely, providing online instruction in the field of culinary arts, entertaining and etiquette; Educational services, namely, providing online instruction in the field of culinary arts, entertaining, etiquette, healthy eating, new recipes, gastronomical tours, and shopping bargains via an online website; Entertainment in the nature of visual and audio performances by chefs, celebrities, and participants; Entertainment services, namely, providing a web site featuring photographic, audio, video and prose presentations featuring culinary arts, entertaining, gastronomical tours, and etiquette; Entertainment services, namely, providing an on-going radio program in the field of food; Providing a website featuring blogs and non-downloadable publications in the nature of prose, video, audio in the field(s) of culinary arts, entertaining, and etiquette; Providing a website for entertainment purposes where users can view and post comments, presentations, questions, short messages, videos, and discussions featuring chef's, culinary arts, entertaining and etiquette | ACTIVE | Mar 23, 2011 |
| 043 | Consulting in the field of restaurant menu development; Providing progressive dinner events where participants sample meals and drinks at a series of restaurants; Restaurant services featuring consultation, advice, menu assistance, restaurant tours, chef interviews, reviews, and assistance with culinary arts and prep; Restaurant services, namely, providing of food and beverages for consumption on and off the premises | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 27, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 1, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |