Drawing for FABULOUS SHOE NIGHT "INDULGENCE WITH A CONSCIENCE"

USPTO serial 85468639

FABULOUS SHOE NIGHT "INDULGENCE WITH A CONSCIENCE"

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMAS, AMY E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FABULOUS SHOE NIGHT "INDULGENCE WITH A CONSCIENCE"?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter Wakiyama

PETER WAKIYAMA PEPPER HAMILTON LLP3000 EIGHTEENTH & ARCH STS3000 TWO LOGAN SQPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Administration of a program for enabling participants to obtain discounts on shoes, accessories and affinity group service opportunitiesACTIVE—
041Organizing and conducting charity events in the nature of cocktail parties and dinners, product promotion events, social gatherings, part of the proceeds of which are donated to charitiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 11, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 11, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 7, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 12, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 23, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 8, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 8, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 19, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 2, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 2, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 29, 2012GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 29, 2012GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 29, 2012CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 27, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 16, 2011MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Nov 15, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 12, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance