Drawing for POWER BLACKJACK

USPTO serial 85469595

POWER BLACKJACK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DEFORD, JEFFREY S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with POWER BLACKJACK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Clinton J. Cusick

Clinton J. Cusick Cusick IP, PLLC623 North Broad StreetLANSDALE, PA 19446UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Leasing of casino games; providing a game of chance in a casino, namely, a card gameACTIVEMar 21, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 11, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 14, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 15, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2013CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 3, 2013SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 30, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 3, 2013IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 3, 2013EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Oct 20, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 17, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 17, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 17, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 21, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 1, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 17, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 13, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 23, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 20, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 17, 2011MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Nov 16, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance