Drawing for EBX

USPTO serial 85470419

EBX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JACKSON, WILLIAM D
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EBX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James A. Dimitrijevs

James Dimitrijevs McDonald Hopkins, LLC600 Superior Avenue East, Ste 2100Cleveland, OH 44114UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Fundraising, namely, business fundraising for others, financial information, financial sponsorship of entertainment, sporting and cultural activities; financial sponsorship of infrastructure improvement projects; capital investment; investment of funds for others; financial management; providing venture capital and development capital to other home and foreign companies incorporated under any corporate form and for any corporate purposeACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 16, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 16, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 15, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 13, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 13, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 13, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 13, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 18, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 29, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 10, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 30, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 30, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 30, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 30, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 30, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 18, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 18, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 18, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 15, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 15, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 29, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 29, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 29, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 29, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 16, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance