USPTO serial 85471393
FLYERTOWN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 11, 2017
- Examiner
- HETZEL, DANNEAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FLYERTOWN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Theodore D. Lienesch
THEODORE D. LIENESCH THOMPSON HINE LLP10050 INNOVATION DR STE 400MIAMISBURG, OH 45342-4934UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising the goods and services of others; promoting and marketing the goods and services of others through interactive website featuring online shopping, online flyers, advertisements, coupons, and promotional offers; operating an electronic commerce website connecting site visitors to the merchants and manufacturers through online shopping, online flyers, advertisements, coupons and promotional offers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) provider for providing web-based computer software and database to create, store, publish, and deliver online flyers, advertisements, coupons and promotional offers; software as a service (SAAS) provider for providing web-based computer software and database to track, log and analyze consumer online searching and shopping habits | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WISHABI, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by FLIPP CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by FLIPP CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by FLIPP CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named FLYERTOWN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2024 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 23, 2023 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 25, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 11, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 2, 2017 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 15, 2017 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 15, 2017 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 20, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 31, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 4, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 2, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 15, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 14, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 30, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 17, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |