Drawing for CLEARALIGN

USPTO serial 85471643

CLEARALIGN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHIH, SALLY
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CLEARALIGN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian A. Bloom

JACQUELINE I FULOP GOODLING40 CROSSWAYS PARK DRSTE 105WOODBURY, NY 11797

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer application software for mobile devices, namely, software for mobile phones, mobile computers and tablet personal electronic devices used to track proposed courses of orthodontic treatment, schedule appointments for orthodontic adjustments and treatment and to modify patient data and information related to their individualized orthodontic treatment plansABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 18, 2016MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 18, 2016ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 18, 2016OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 18, 2016OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Dec 12, 2012OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 7, 2012ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 14, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 25, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 5, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 14, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 14, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 17, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 18, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Nov 17, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance