USPTO serial 85473456
LITTLE JOCKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LITTLE JOCKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Port Orange, FL
SOUTH DAYTONA, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael L. Leetzow
MICHAEL L. LEETZOW MICHAEL L. LEETZOW, P.A.2393 CREST RIDGE CTSANFORD, FL 32771-8326UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Athletic apparel, namely, shirts, pants, jackets, footwear, hats and caps, athletic uniforms; Baby bibs not of paper; Baby bodysuits; Baby bottoms; Baby tops; Children's and infant's apparel, namely, jumpers, overall sleepwear, pajamas, rompers and one-piece garments; Children's and infants' cloth bibs; Children's headwear; Cloth diapers; Footies; Footwear; Gloves; Gloves as clothing; Hats for infants, babies, toddlers and children; Head wear; Hooded pullovers; Hooded sweat shirts; Hooded sweatshirts; Infant and toddler one piece clothing; Infants' shoes and boots; Infantwear; Nightwear; One piece garment for infants and toddlers; One-piece garments for children; Pajamas; Protective neck and arm guards made of neoprene or other materials to prevent wetsuit chafing; Shirts for infants, babies, toddlers and children; Sleepwear; Snap crotch shirts for infants and toddlers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 8, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 21, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 20, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 7, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 12, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 9, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 6, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |