USPTO serial 85473613
WTC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WTC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joanne Thelmo
Joanne Thelmo World Trade Centers Association, Inc.115 Broadway, Suite 1202New York, NY 10006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | backpacks, book bags, sports bags, bum bags, handbags, duffel bags, fanny packs, garment bags for travel, gym bags, leather cases, tote bags, shoulder bags, clutch bags, roll bags, briefcases, purses, coin purses, cosmetic bags sold empty, cosmetic carrying cases sold empty, cosmetic cases sold empty, suitcases, luggage, luggage tags, luggage tag holders, straps for carrying cases, toiletry bags and cases sold empty, wallets including card holders/with card compartments, waist packs, wristlet bags, umbrellas excluding goods commemorating the events of September 11, 2001 | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2019 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 18, 2019 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 18, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 18, 2019 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 5, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 12, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 16, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 16, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | RMDT | EXAMINERS REQUEST FOR REMAND TO TTAB | — |
| Aug 28, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 11, 2013 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2013 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 6, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 10, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 9, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 9, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |