USPTO serial 85475643
NUTRIFACTS VERIFIED NUTRITIONAL DATA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCRAY, RENEE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NUTRIFACTS VERIFIED NUTRITIONAL DATA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Hale
JOHN S. HALE GIPPLE & HALE6665-A OLD DOMINION DRMC LEAN, VA 22101-4508UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF PRODUCT NUTRITION LABEL VERIFICATION BASED ON MANUFACTURERS' OR PROCESSORS' PRE-DEFINED LABEL SPECIFICATIONS TO ENSURE PRODUCT CORRELATION THROUGH THE BUSINESS TO CUSTOMER CHAIN AND VERIFICATION OF PACKAGING OF GOODS OF OTHERS FOR CORRECT ELECTRONIC PRODUCT CODES IN THE NATURE OF BAR CODES, QR CODES AND RFID FOR COMPLIANCE AND CONFORMITY PURSUANT TO NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS AND VERIFICATION OF NUTRITIONAL DATA USED ON PRODUCT PACKAGING WITH BRAND OWNERS ACCESSING SAME WITH SMART DEVICES TO PROVIDE CUSTOMERS WITH ACCURATE ELECTRONIC PRODUCT DATA | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 5, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 1, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 6, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 17, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 16, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 13, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 22, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 3, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 2011 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |