USPTO serial 85476814
POLAR WARE SINCE 1907
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERRY, KIMBERLY B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with POLAR WARE SINCE 1907?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark J. Diliberti
Mark J. Diliberti Foley & Lardner LLP777 E. Wisconsin AvenueMilwaukee, WI 53202-5306UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | MEDICAL APPARATUS, NAMELY, STORAGE CONTAINERS, GRADUATED MEASURES, FUNNELS, BEAKERS, SOLUTION PAILS, UTILITY SCOOPS, CUPS, INSTRUMENT TRAYS, CATHETER TRAYS, STERILIZATION TRAYS, CLEANING BASKETS, MIXING BOWLS, SOLUTION BASINS, SOAKING BASINS, SPONGE BOWLS, APPLICATOR JARS, SYRINGE STERILIZERS, DRESSING JARS, OINTMENT JARS, FORCEPS JARS, HOSPITAL BUCKETS, KICK BUCKETS, EMESIS BASINS, BEDPANS, THERMOMETER JARS, WASH BASINS, SOAP DISHES, BEDSIDE TRAYS, PITCHERS, TUMBLERS, MENU HOLDERS, SOLUTION BOWLS, SITZ BATH PANS, WIRE GRATES, SERVING INSETS, COOKING PANS, SILVERWARE CYLINDERS, FOOD BALLERS, TONGS, AND SHAKERS, IC 010; and UTENSILS USED FOR FOOD STORAGE, PREPARATION AND SERVING, NAMELY, LARGE SPOONS USED AS SERVING PIECES, COOKING PANS, FOOD BALLERS, LADLES, STOCK POTS, GRADUATED DIPPERS, STRAINERS, COLANDERS, ICE SCOOPS, WHIPS, POTS, STEAM TABLE PANS INCLUDING PAN COVERS, CHAFERS, CHAFER FUEL HOLDERS, CHAFER FRAMES, STEAMING PITCHERS, COFFEE SERVICE CONTAINERS, PANS, TRANSPORT PANS, FOOD BASINS, FOOD BOWLS, LADLES, DIPPERS, SCOOPS, SKIMMERS, TONGS, SPATULAS, TURNERS, ICE CREAM SPADES, STRAINERS, SHAKERS, SPREADERS, CUTTING BOARDS, MEAT TENDERIZERS, MIXING BOWLS, WHIPS, FUNNELS, KNOCK BOXES, CREAMERS, CANISTERS, SUGAR DISHES, TONGS, SERVING PITCHERS, COFFEE DECANTERS, MENU HOLDERS, LOBSTER CRACKERS, SAUCE CUPS, DESSERT DISHES, SILVERWARE CYLINDERS, BAR PAILS, TUMBLERS, ICE SCOOPS, CORKSCREWS, MALT CUPS, JIGGERS, CITRUS SQUEEZERS, SKILLETS; BUFFETWARE, NAMELY, MEAT FORKS, SLICING KNIVES, AND BUFFET FORKS | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PW ACQUISITION, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by PW STOELTING, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by Polar Ware
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named POLAR WARE SINCE 1907
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 9, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 27, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 30, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 18, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 7, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |