Drawing for MULE

USPTO serial 85477514

MULE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KON, ELISSA GARBER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MULE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey C. Katz

JEFFREY C. KATZ DAVIS & GILBERT LLP1740 BROADWAY FL 3NEW YORK, NY 10019-4379UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Apparel relating to ice hockey, namely, T-shirts, jerseys, uniforms, caps, sweatshirts and warm-up suitsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 18, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 18, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 18, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 16, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 16, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 17, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 20, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 20, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 31, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 12, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 11, 2014RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 10, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 10, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 16, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 11, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 27, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 23, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 22, 2012DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 19, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 18, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 16, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2012DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 15, 2012ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 29, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 24, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance