USPTO serial 85478209
SUITEDREAMZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUITEDREAMZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
port washington, NY
port washington, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
hyunjung kim
2 HARBOR PARK DRPORT WASHINGTON, NY 11050-4602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Access control and alarm monitoring systems; Acoustic sound alarms; Alarm central units; Alarm installations and alarms; Alarm monitoring systems; Alarm that utilizes pressure sensitive pads to monitor patients or resident movement; Alarms for the detection of inflammable gases; Anti-intrusion alarms; Audio and video cassette recorders; Audio and video recordings about tennis; Audio and video recordings featuring music and artistic performances; Audio and visual headsets for use in playing video games; Audio books in the nature of novels; Audio cables; Audio cassette and CD players; Audio cassette decks for automobiles; Audio cassette players; Audio cassette recorders; Audio circuit boards; Blank CD-ROMs for sound or video recording; Blank video cassettes; Blank video tapes; Building security systems comprising software and hardware for providing picture, video, alarm status, building plans, and other information to a remote station; Burglar alarms; Burglar alarms; Camera hardware systems for IP (Internet protocol) video surveillance; Camera stability accessory, namely, a support arm, vest and sled for film and video cameras to absorb shaking moves while shooting; Car video recorders; Central processing unit (CPU) clocks; Children's video tapes; Cleaning discs for cleaning the lens of optical disc drives used in computers and digital video recorders; Computerized time clock with fingerprint recognition; Countdown timer(s) and alarms to remind a person to take or give a medication(s) and/or to remind a person to do a daily routine(s) incorporated into a wristband; Electrical and electronic burglar alarms; Electronic alarm for providing notice of bed-wetting; Electronic door alarms; Electronic exit alarms; Electronic touch sensitive pads for use with infant movement alarms; Electronically encoded badges and swipe cards for use with time clocks | ACTIVE | Nov 22, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 21, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2013 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 8, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 21, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 19, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 24, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 4, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |