USPTO serial 85479071
FLYING DOG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FLYING DOG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank J Jordan
FRANK J JORDAN JORDAN AND HAMBURG, LLP122 E 42ND ST RM 4000NEW YORK, NY 10168-0069UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | footwear, namely, leather shoes, leather slippers, rubber shoes, rubber boots, golf shoes, wooden shoes, fishing shoes, basketball sneakers, basketball shoes, deck shoes, hiking boots, hiking shoes, rugby shoes, lace boots, motorcycle boots, bath sandals, bath slippers, mules, short boots, ballet slippers, ballet shoes, winter boots, volleyball shoes, boxing shoes, bowling shoes, boots, vinyl shoes, beach shoes, cycling shoes, sandals, wooden sandals, ski boots, boots for sports, sports shoes, shoes, slippers, riding boots, shoe parts, ankle boots, baseball shoes, sandals, woman's shoes, overshoes, athletic shoes, babies shoes and boots, shoes for athletic sports, work shoes, high boots, straw shoes, gymnastic shoes, football boots, studs for football boots and shoes, tennis shoes, laced shoes, hockey shoes, handball shoes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 8, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 4, 2012 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 3, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 5, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 12, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |