Drawing for INCOMMAND

USPTO serial 85479206

INCOMMAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FIRST, VIVIAN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INCOMMAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael F. Sarney

MICHAEL F. SARNEY KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP575 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-2511UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035On-line retail store services featuring new and used construction and industrial equipmentACTIVE—
037On-line rental services featuring construction equipment, cleaning equipment, earth moving equipment, air compressors, air tools, compactors, cranes for construction purposes, light towers for construction purposes, plumbing equipment, power tools, pressure washers, surface preparation and remediation equipmentACTIVE—
039On-line rental services, featuring aerial lifts, forklifts, power distribution equipment, traffic control equipment, trucks, trailers, and utility vehiclesACTIVE—
040On-line rental services featuring electric power generators, space cooling units, industrial air conditioners, mobile chillers, and welding equipmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 2, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 2, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 30, 2013NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 5, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 13, 2013NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 26, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 25, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 24, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 24, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 23, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 23, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 23, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 25, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 29, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 29, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 9, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 2012ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 13, 2012PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Mar 31, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 27, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 8, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 7, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Nov 30, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 25, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance