USPTO serial 85479286
ENBRIDGE PIPELINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENBRIDGE PIPELINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Calgary, Alberta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle M. Marsh, Esq.
MICHELLE M. MARSH, ESQ. Arent Fox LLP1675 BroadwayNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | Compressed natural gas, natural gas vehicle equipment and accessories; equipment, supplies, and facilities for use in the production, generation, co-generation, distribution, transportation, transmission, storage, treatment, management, conservation, research and development and consumption of energy and water resources; oil, natural gas, natural gas liquids, coal and sulphur; training manuals and instruction materials on the subject of pipeline operations, management, maintenance, efficiency, design, technology and safety; computer software and systems for the management and maintenance of pipelines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 18, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 10, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 8, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 8, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 16, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |