USPTO serial 85479967
VERIFAYA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4708559Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 24, 2015
- Examiner
- COLLIER, DAVID E
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VERIFAYA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Clara, CA
SANTA CLARA, CA
Milpitas, CA
Milpitas, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for testing the performance of computer software, mobile device software and computer systems, for automating and coordinating those tests, and for creating and sending reports to users regarding the tests; downloadable electronic publications, namely, instruction, user and training manuals in the field of computer software and computer systems test automation services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 16, 2012 |
| 042 | Testing, analysis and evaluation of the goods and services of others for the purpose of certification; testing, analysis, and evaluation of the performance of computer software, mobile device software and computer systems of others to verify quality; software as a services (SaaS) services featuring software for testing the performance of computer software, mobile device software and computer systems, for automating and coordinating those tests, and for creating and sending reports to users regarding the tests; development and implementation of software, hardware and technology solutions for the purpose of testing of computer software, mobile device software and computer systems; consulting services in the field of software and computer systems testing; technological planning and consulting services in the field of computer software and computer systems test automation services; computer software consulting services; consulting services in the fields of selection, implementation and use of computer software systems for others; technical verification and validation of the performance of computer software, mobile device software and computer systems of others to verify quality | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 31, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TCZ Holdings Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by VERIFAYA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by VERIFAYA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by VERIFAYA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named VERIFAYA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 26, 2015 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2015 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2015 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2015 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2015 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 11, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 17, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 30, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 8, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 13, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 24, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 30, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |