USPTO serial 85480454
WEBSCHEDULERMOBILE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAKER, JORDAN A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WEBSCHEDULERMOBILE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard A. Arrett
RICHARD A ARRETT VIDAS ARRETT & STEINKRAUS PA6640 SHADY OAK RDSTE 400EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344-7700Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer application software for mobile phones, handheld computers, and touchscreen devices, namely, software for transacting business which provides a comprehensive scheduling system designed for the electrical energy market, offering real-time validation of energy trading transactions (also known as "E-Tags") and fully complies with the North American Energy Standards Board (NAESB) electronic tagging requirements and specifications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2013 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 23, 2013 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2013 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2013 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 31, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 31, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 31, 2012 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | PBMR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - MANAGING ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 3, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |