USPTO serial 85481000
BITEOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REGAN, JOHN B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BITEOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
KAINOS DENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC.
WALNUT CREEK, CA
KAINOS DENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC.
WALNUT CREEK, CA
Dental Enhancement Solutions, Inc.
Walnut Creek, CA
Other trademarks owned by Dental Enhancement Solutions, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles L. Thoeming
CHARLES L. THOEMING LAW OFFICES OF CHARLES L. THOEMING/BIELEN, LAMPE &1390 WILLOW PASS RD STE 1020CONCORD, CA 94520-5288UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Consulting services in the field of dental practice management; Dental practice management for others; Providing a website for dental practice management and administrative support services to individual dentists or group practices; Providing business research services, namely, researching dental patient insurance information for dental offices | ACTIVE | May 1, 2012 |
| 042 | Digital enhancement and manipulation of radiological data by means of computerized software for use in the field of dental implants | ACTIVE | May 1, 2012 |
| 044 | Cosmetic dentistry; Dental hygienist services; Dental services, namely, performing restorative and cosmetic procedures; Dental services, namely, treatment of patients with snoring, sleep apnea and TMJ (temporomandibular joint) disorders; Dentistry; Dentistry services, namely, administering portable intravenous sedation; Oral surgery and dental implant services; Providing a website featuring information for dentists on the subject of treatments and procedures related to dentistry; Providing a website featuring information for patients in the field of dental health; Providing news and information in the field of dentistry; Sports dentistry; Veterinary dentistry; Veterinary specialty services providing advanced dental and oral surgery | ACTIVE | May 1, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KAINOS DENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC.
- Other trademarks owned by KAINOS DENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC.
- Other trademarks owned by Dental Enhancement Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named BITEOLOGY
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 26, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2012 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 22, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 19, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 10, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 15, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 6, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 6, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 29, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |