Drawing for QUALI PHITE

USPTO serial 85481139

QUALI PHITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with QUALI PHITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark D. Miller

MARK D. MILLER SIERRA IP LAW, PCPO BOX 5637FRESNO, CA 93755-5637UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005agricultural and horticultural fungicidesACTIVENov 30, 2012

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 1, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 1, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 18, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 5, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2013CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2013SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 12, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 24, 2013IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 24, 2013EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Nov 22, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 20, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 20, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 20, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 3, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 26, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 1, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 1, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 11, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 27, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 9, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 9, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 2, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance