USPTO serial 85481282
MASTER BUILDERS SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 5, 2016
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with MASTER BUILDERS SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Construction Research & Technology GmbH
Trostberg, DE
Other trademarks owned by Construction Research & Technology GmbH
Construction Research & Technology GmbH
Trostberg, DE
Other trademarks owned by Construction Research & Technology GmbH
Construction Research & Technology GmbH
Trostberg, DE
Other trademarks owned by Construction Research & Technology GmbH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Salvatore A. Sidoti
Salvatore A. Sidoti Curatolo Sidoti & Trillis Co., LPA24500 CENTER RIDGE ROADSUITE 280CLEVELAND, OH 44145-5681Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemicals used in industry and building construction | ACTIVE | Nov 27, 2013 |
| 002 | coatings in the nature of industrial sealers for waterproofing and surface hardening, namely, concrete hardeners; [ preservatives against rust ] [ and against deterioration of wood ] [, namely, rust preservatives in the nature of a coating ] [ and wood preservatives ] [ ; architectural protective coatings, namely, decorative and protective coatings used for exterior walls, excluding latex paints for interior walls; architectural protective coatings, namely, cement-based decorative and protective coatings used for exterior walls, excluding latex paints for interior walls; architectural protective coatings, namely, polymer-based decorative and protective coatings used for exterior walls, excluding latex paints for interior walls; architectural protective coatings, namely, polymer-modified cement decorative and protective coatings used for exterior walls, excluding latex paints for interior walls; ] preservative coatings for masonry; water-proofing, water-repellant and damp-proofing coatings and membranes, namely, coatings in the nature of industrial sealers for waterproofing and surface hardening; [ chemical resistant coatings, excluding latex paints for interior walls; ] coatings in the nature of industrial sealers for waterproofing and surface hardening, namely, sealer coatings to protect against intrusion of water, contaminants, and to protect against abrasion and wear in building and construction; [ floor coatings; polymeric floor coatings; aggregate-containing polymeric floor coatings; polymeric wall coatings for exterior walls, excluding latex paints for interior walls; ] corrosion inhibitants in the nature of a coating, namely, non-latex corrosion-inhibiting compositions for cementitious structures | ACTIVE | Nov 27, 2013 |
| 019 | [ flooring underlayments, namely, cementitious floor underlayment compositions; ] cement; grout; polymer-modified grouts; mortar; [ polymer-modified mortar; ] [ masonry cement; ] cementitious patching and repair compounds; cement fillers, namely, crack fillers for cementitious structures; [ repair mortar; cement aggregates, namely, aggregate for use in the manufacture of polymeric concrete; polymeric concrete for floors; concrete toppings, namely, aggregate filled polymer toppings and aggregate filled cementitious toppings; polymer-modified and cement-based metallic aggregate floor toppings; synthetic flooring materials, namely, methyl-methacrylate polymer concrete floor systems; waterproofing membranes, namely, cement-based waterproofing coatings and polymer-modified cement-based waterproofing coatings; aggregate for cementitious compositions and floors; nonmetal, woven fabrics for reinforcing building structures; ] mortar, namely, shotcrete compositions, gunnable cementitious compositions and sprayable cementitious compositions | ACTIVE | Nov 27, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Construction Research & Technology GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Construction Research & Technology GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Construction Research & Technology GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named MASTER BUILDERS SOLUTIONS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2026 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2026 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 10, 2026 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 10, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 6, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2022 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2022 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 1, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 5, 2022 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 27, 2016 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 27, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2015 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2015 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 25, 2015 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 2, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 9, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 25, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 25, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 15, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2014 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jan 15, 2014 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 15, 2014 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 29, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 14, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 14, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 8, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |