USPTO serial 85481374
HUNGRY GIRL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 12, 2014
- Examiner
- BIDDULPH, HEATHER ANN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with HUNGRY GIRL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason Zedeck
Jason Zedeck Law Office of Jason ZedeckP.O. Box 35210Los Angeles, CA 90035-0210United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | [Providing non-downloadable newsletters via email featuring information about food, reviews, nutritional and dietary information, recipes, food finds and suggestions, and providing general news and information regarding dining and nutrition, weight management and weight loss to consumers;] Entertainment services in the nature of ongoing television programs, namely, television programs related to food and cooking; providing information regarding television shows via a global computer network | ACTIVE | Jan 8, 2011 |
| 043 | Online computer services, namely, providing a website featuring general news and information about restaurant reviews, recipe reviews, cooking information and recipes to consumers via an online computer network, via one or more websites; Online computer services, namely, providing a website featuring news and information in the field of dining relating to food finds and food item reviews | ACTIVE | Apr 29, 2004 |
| 044 | Online computer services, namely, providing a website featuring information about nutritional and dietary information, providing general news and information regarding nutrition, weight management and weight loss to consumers via an online computer network, via one or more websites | ACTIVE | Apr 29, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hungry Girl, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Hungry Girl, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Hungry Girl, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named HUNGRY GIRL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2024 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2024 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 4, 2024 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 4, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 7, 2024 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 21, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 17, 2020 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 27, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 10, 2014 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 22, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 2, 2014 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 10, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 10, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 19, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 6, 2013 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| May 6, 2013 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| May 6, 2013 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | PGOA | PETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION | — |
| Mar 25, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 15, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 8, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 1, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 8, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 14, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |