USPTO serial 85482181
NEWGYPSUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RHIM, ANDREW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NEWGYPSUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
INOVAMAT INOVAÇÃO EM MATERIAIS LTDA
SÃO CARLOS, SÃO PAULO, BR
Other trademarks owned by INOVAMAT INOVAÇÃO EM MATERIAIS LTDA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Cement; Concrete; Plaster; Silica cement | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 2, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 31, 2017 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 27, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 8, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 13, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 23, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 2, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |