USPTO serial 85482400
MACKISS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIBB, SCOTT
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MACKISS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Daejeon, KR
Daejeon, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
P. Jay Hines
P JAY HINES CANTOR COLBURN LLP1800 DIAGONAL RDSTE 400ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-2860Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Korean traditional rice wine; Korean liquor distilled or diluted; rice alcohol; refined rice wine; ginseng liquor; sake; unstrained rice wine; compound rice wine; strawberry wine; rum; liqueurs; piquette; Japanese apricot liquor; wild grapes wine; sparkling fruit wine; sparkling grape wine; perry; kirsch; vermouth; vodka; brandy; alcoholic bitters; hard cider; champagne; sweet wines; table wines; anise; arak; aperitifs; alcoholic fruit extracts; alcoholic essences; alcoholic extracts; alcoholic beverages containing fruit; absinthe; wine coolers; alcoholic cocktails containing milk; whisky; citron wine; distilled beverages, namely, distilled spirits; gin; natural sparkling wine; cocktails, namely, prepared alcoholic cocktails; coffee-based liqueurs; curacao; wine; Chinese spirit of sorghum; viper liquor; peppermint liqueurs; hydromel; tonic liquor containing herb extracts; liquor flavored with pine needle extracts; flavored tonic liquors; acanthopanax wine; Chinese white liquor, namely, Chinese Baijiu; Chinese brewed liquor; tiger bone liquor | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2013 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 30, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 18, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 10, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 15, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |