USPTO serial 85482562
SCHLAFLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 28, 2019
- Examiner
- FATHY, DOMINIC
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with SCHLAFLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Saint Louis, MO
ST. LOUIS, MO
ST. LOUIS, MO
ST. LOUIS, MO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kelly M Spann
Kelly M Spann TM Law & Associates, LLC400 Chesterfield CenterSuite 400Chesterfield[St Louis], MO 63017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beer, ale and lager; Beer, ale and porter; Beer, ale, lager, stout and porter; Beers; Black beer; Brewed malt-based alcoholic beverage in the nature of a beer; Coffee-flavored beer | ACTIVE | Jan 15, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by THE SAINT LOUIS BREWERY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by THE SAINT LOUIS BREWERY, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by THE SAINT LOUIS BREWERY, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by THE SAINT LOUIS BREWERY, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named SCHLAFLY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2025 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2025 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 30, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 20, 2025 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 23, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 23, 2019 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Apr 23, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 23, 2019 | CTDA | CT DECISION: AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | CTDA | CT DECISION: AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 2, 2016 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 2, 2016 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Nov 3, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2014 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | CRTP | REG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | RCII | REQUEST TO CANCEL INADVERTENTLY ISSUED REGISTRATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 30, 2013 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| May 30, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 30, 2013 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 29, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 29, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 29, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |