Drawing for BRANDFLUENCE

USPTO serial 85483254

BRANDFLUENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, DOUGLAS
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRANDFLUENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David J. Davis

David J. Davis Baker & McKenzie LLP300 E. Randolph StreetSuite 5000Chicago, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising agencies; Advertising agencies, namely, promoting the goods and services of others; Advertising agency specializing in the design and execution of word of mouth, viral, buzz and experiential marketing programs; Advertising and business management consultancy; Advertising and publicity services, namely, promoting the goods, services, brand identity and commercial information and news of third parties through print, audio, video, digital and on-line medium; Advertising services, namely, creating corporate and brand identity for others; Advertising services, public relations and marketing services, namely, promoting and marketing the goods and services of others through all public communication means; Advertising via electronic media and specifically the internet; Advertising, including promotion relating to the sale of articles and services for third parties by the transmission of advertising material and the dissemination of advertising messages on computer networks; Design of internet advertising; Promoting the goods and services of others by preparing and placing advertisements in an electronic magazine accessed through a global computer networkACTIVE—
038Audio and video broadcasting services over the Internet; Cable radio broadcasting; Providing internet chatrooms; Radio broadcasting; Streaming of audio, visual and audiovisual material via a global computer network; Video broadcasting services over the Internet or other communications network, namely, showing, displaying, and electronically transmitting video clipsACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, multimedia production services; Media production services, namely, video and film production; On-line journals, namely, blogs featuring the provision of new ideas and concepts for web-based and other media applications for others; Production of radio and television programsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 21, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 21, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 5, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 23, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 22, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 4, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2013TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jan 4, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 4, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 3, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 8, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 8, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 18, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 2, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 15, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 13, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 6, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Dec 5, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 3, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance