USPTO serial 85483436
SAF-T
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SAF-T?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Hartford, CT
West Hartford, CT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT S. SMITH TCMP-UCL
ROBERT S. SMITH TCMP-UCL UCONN IP LAW CLINIC222 PITKIN ST STE 105EAST HARTFORD, CT 06108-3220UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Relaxation therapy in the nature of autogenous training through the use of eye movements, namely, training of the eyes to enhance therapeutic techniques relating to such relaxation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 15, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 12, 2013 | EARS | EARLY STATEMENT OF USE NOT PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 31, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 17, 2013 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 17, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 14, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |