Drawing for SIMPLY ORANGECELLO

USPTO serial 85483943

SIMPLY ORANGECELLO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMAS, AMY E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIMPLY ORANGECELLO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Luke Brean

LUKE BREAN BREANLAW LLCPO BOX 4120PORTLAND, OR 97208-4120UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverage, namely, orange flavored liqueurACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 16, 2015MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 15, 2015ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 15, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 31, 2015EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 26, 2014GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2014GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2014CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
May 12, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 11, 2014GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 11, 2014GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 11, 2014CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 29, 2014EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 29, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 28, 2014NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2014PGTTPETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED—
Jan 21, 2014APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Dec 28, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 28, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 28, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 1, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 1, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 1, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 15, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 14, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 5, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 4, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 4, 2013ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 13, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 12, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 12, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 16, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 6, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Dec 5, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 3, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance