Drawing for BRIQ

USPTO serial 85484312

BRIQ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
COLEMAN, NICHOLAS A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRIQ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lynne E. Graybeal

LYNNE E. GRAYBEAL PERKINS COIE LLP1201 3RD AVE STE 4900SEATTLE, WA 98101-3099UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Financial services, namely, providing valuation services regarding advertising; financial valuation of video advertising inventory; financial services, namely, providing transactions involving funds from advertisers over a global data network, and providing online financial information relating to advertising; financial valuation services; financial services, namely, financial valuation of advertising impressions for third partiesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 14, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 14, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 10, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 16, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jul 16, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 26, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jun 11, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 9, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jun 8, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 7, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 7, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 1, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 29, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Apr 29, 2013EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Apr 29, 2013JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Apr 29, 2013EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Oct 29, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Oct 29, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 29, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 18, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 17, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 17, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 25, 2012CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
May 25, 2012COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Mar 15, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 6, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 3, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance