USPTO serial 85484665
PROAGTIVE TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4386275Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 20, 2013
- Examiner
- BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PROAGTIVE TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph W. Byrne
JOSEPH W. BYRNE BOARDMAN, SUHR, CURRY & FIELD LLP1 S PINCKNEY ST FL 4MADISON, WI 53703-4256UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Custom design and development of animal feeds for others; scientific consulting and research services relating to animal and livestock nutrition, animal and livestock feeds, and animal and livestock dietary supplements and additives; testing, analysis, and evaluation of forage and animal and livestock feed and foodstuffs for purposes of custom design and development and providing basic analysis reports; and product development consulting in the fields of animal and livestock nutrition products and animal and livestock feeds | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 4, 2011 |
| 044 | Agricultural consultancy services; agricultural advisory services; animal nutritional counseling; livestock nutritional counseling; animal food nutrition consultation; livestock food nutrition consultation; dietetic advisory services for animals and livestock; dietary and nutritional guidance for animals and livestock; consulting services in the fields of animal and livestock health and nutrition; agricultural consultancy and advisory services, namely, custom formulation of nutritional diets for animals and livestock; providing information about dietary supplements and nutrition for animals and livestock; dietary and nutritional guidance services, namely, providing consultancy and advisory services in connection with the preparation of nutritional feeds, diet feeds, and feed rations for animals; agricultural consultancy and advisory services in the fields of animal and livestock feeds, feed nutrition, feed rations, feed use recommendations, feed formulation, feeding, feeding programs, feeding bunk management, diets, diet formulation, nutrition, nutritional formulation, care and comfort, housing, husbandry, and breeding; providing information in the fields of animal and livestock feeds, feed nutrition, feed rations, feed use recommendations, feed formulation, feeding, feeding programs, feeding bunk management, diets, diet formulation, nutrition, nutritional formulation, husbandry, and breeding; agricultural consultancy and advisory services and providing information in the fields of forage analysis, forage and crop residue management, crop and feed harvests, crop and feed growth, crop and feed storage, crop and feed handling, farm management, herd management, livestock management, herd health, herd performance monitoring, and herd reproduction monitoring; agricultural consultancy and advisory services, namely, providing ration balancing services and ration formulation services; and technical consulting and research services relating to animal and livestock nutrition, animal and livestock feeds, and animal and livestock dietary supplements and additives | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 4, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ProAGtive Technologies, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ProAGtive Technologies, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ProAGtive Technologies, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named PROAGTIVE TECHNOLOGIES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 20, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 4, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 15, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 15, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 15, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 15, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 19, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 2, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |