Drawing for Serial No. 85484790

USPTO serial 85484790

Serial No. 85484790

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VANSTON, KATHY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 85484790?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lynne M.J. Boisineau

LYNNE M.J. BOISINEAU MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP18191 VON KARMAN AVE STE 500IRVINE, CA 92612-7108UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Long-range passive infrared sensor system comprised of thermal sensors, electronic sensors, and computer software, used for target designationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 2, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 14, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 13, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 31, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 31, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 22, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 21, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 21, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 23, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 23, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 8, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 2, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 29, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 29, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 1, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 6, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 15, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 31, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 31, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 14, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 13, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 12, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 3, 2012GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 3, 2012GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 3, 2012CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 1, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 7, 2011MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Dec 6, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance