USPTO serial 85484948
GREAT PERFORMANCES DAILY MEDFORD AND THE ROGUE VALLEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 19, 2013
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GREAT PERFORMANCES DAILY MEDFORD AND THE ROGUE VALLEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
The Chamber of Medford/Jackson County
Medford, OR
Other trademarks owned by The Chamber of Medford/Jackson County
The Chamber of Medford/Jackson County
Medford, OR
Other trademarks owned by The Chamber of Medford/Jackson County
The Chamber of Medford/Jackson County
Medford, OR
Other trademarks owned by The Chamber of Medford/Jackson County
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald L. Otto
DONALD L. OTTO RENNER, OTTO, BOISSELLE & SKLAR, LLP1621 EUCLID AVE FL 19CLEVELAND, OH 44115-2193UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | chamber of commerce services, namely, promoting business, meetings, conventions, tourism and sporting events in the Medford metropolitan and Rogue Valley areas of Oregon | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 23, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Chamber of Medford/Jackson County
- Other trademarks owned by The Chamber of Medford/Jackson County
- Other trademarks owned by The Chamber of Medford/Jackson County
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named GREAT PERFORMANCES DAILY MEDFORD AND THE ROGUE VALLEY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 19, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 12, 2013 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 10, 2013 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 16, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 21, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 1, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 17, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 17, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |