Drawing for PG PURIFICACION GARCIA

USPTO serial 85485002

PG PURIFICACION GARCIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PG PURIFICACION GARCIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patrick J. Jennings

PATRICK J. JENNINGS PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP1200 Seventeenth Street, NWWashington, DC 20036-3006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Brooches; insignias of precious metals; jewellery; precious stones; horological and chronometric instrumentsACTIVE—
018Leather and imitation leather and goods made of these materials, namely, all-purpose carrying bags, handbags, wallets, and suitcases; animal skins; animal hides; trunks; traveling bags; umbrellas; parasols; walking sticks; whips; harnesses; and saddleryACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, shirts, pants, shorts, dresses, skirts, sweaters, sweatshirts, vests, socks, jackets, caps, belts, gloves, headwear, and shoes; footwear; and beltsACTIVE—
035Retail store services featuring leather articles and imitations of leather, animal skins, trunks, travelling bags, hand bags, umbrellas, parasols, walking sticks, and clothing; franchising services, namely, providing advice regarding the operation of a commercial company; and publicity and sales promotion servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 9, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 9, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 7, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2015EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 27, 2015EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 27, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 13, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 4, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 4, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 7, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 24, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 24, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 8, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 7, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 3, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 3, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 3, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 6, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 4, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 4, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 4, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 9, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 14, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 14, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 25, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 7, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 18, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 15, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 15, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 15, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 4, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 4, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 20, 2012GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 20, 2012GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 20, 2012CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 20, 2012GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 20, 2012GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 20, 2012CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 14, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Dec 7, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance